← Resources

Playbooks

Competitor analysis ppc template

A competitor analysis PPC template that fuses classic competitor-analysis structure (SWOT, positioning) with PPC-specific data (keywords, ad copy, Auction Insights) so the output drives shipped bidding and creative changes.

Updated

Before you start

  • Familiarity with classic competitor-analysis frameworks (SWOT, positioning matrix)
  • A spreadsheet tool (Google Sheets or Excel)
  • Top 10-20 PPC keywords by spend identified
  • One competitor research tool: SpyFu, SEMrush, or Ahrefs (Auction Insights covers the free path)
  • 60-90 minutes for the first template population; 20 minutes monthly

The playbook

7 steps

0/7
  1. Start with the classic competitor-analysis spine

    The template fuses competitor-analysis structure with PPC data - so it starts with the classic spine: company name, positioning statement, target customer, value proposition, primary differentiator. Five fields per competitor. This isn't PPC-specific data; it's the strategic context that lets the PPC layer make sense. Skip this section and your PPC template becomes a data dump with no interpretive frame.

    Expected outcome

    A strategic spine documenting each competitor's positioning and target customer.

  2. Layer in the PPC keyword + bidding section

    Add columns for: shared keywords (count + list), estimated monthly PPC spend, top 5 keywords they bid on, Auction Insights impression share against you, position above rate. This is the PPC-specific data the classic template lacks. Pull from SpyFu / SEMrush for shared keywords and estimated spend; Auction Insights for impression-share data.

    # Template columns per competitor:
    Name | Positioning | Target Customer | Value Prop | Differentiator
    Shared Keywords | Est Monthly Spend | Top 5 Keywords
    Impression Share | Position Above Rate | Overlap Rate

    Expected outcome

    A combined strategic + PPC view per competitor in a single template row.

  3. Add the SWOT layer specific to PPC

    Classic SWOT applied to PPC: Strengths (where they outrank you), Weaknesses (where you outrank them), Opportunities (keywords they don't bid on but should), Threats (keywords they could enter that would damage you). PPC-specific SWOT differs from general SWOT - the four cells are evidenced from auction data rather than market opinion. Each cell gets bullet points with specific keywords cited.

    TipPPC SWOT cells must cite specific keywords, not abstract claims. 'Strong on B2B SaaS keywords' is too vague. 'Strong on "crm software" (62% impression share above us)' is the right specificity.

    Expected outcome

    A PPC-specific SWOT per competitor with each cell evidenced by specific keywords and auction data.

  4. Add the ad copy + landing page section

    Two columns: dominant ad-copy archetype (price-led / feature-led / social-proof / urgency / comparison) and landing-page type (PDP / lead form / demo booking / pricing page). These two fields capture 80% of the creative differentiation between competitors and let you scan the template to spot creative patterns at a glance.

    Expected outcome

    An ad-copy archetype + landing-page-type tag per competitor that surfaces creative patterns.

  5. Add the positioning matrix section

    Plot each competitor on a 2x2: price (low/high) × positioning specificity (mass-market / niche). This is the visual layer that classic competitor analysis includes and PPC templates usually skip. Plotting competitors visually reveals whitespace in the category you might occupy - empty quadrants are positioning opportunities, crowded quadrants are competitive zones.

    Expected outcome

    A visual 2x2 positioning matrix showing where competitors cluster and where whitespace exists.

  6. Build the action sheet output section

    Bottom of the template: the output. Three sections - Bidding Changes (defend / cede / attack decisions), Creative Tests (ad-copy archetype tests, landing-page experiments), Positioning Moves (positioning whitespace to occupy in messaging). Each row has: change, source (which template section evidenced it), owner, ship date, expected impact. The action sheet is the only output anyone outside the template uses.

    Expected outcome

    A 1-page action sheet at the template's bottom translating the analysis into shippable changes.

  7. Set the refresh cadence: monthly tactical, quarterly strategic

    The PPC layer of the template refreshes monthly (15-20 min) - Auction Insights, ad-copy updates, action-sheet review. The strategic spine and SWOT refresh quarterly (30 min) - positioning shifts, new entrants, strategic moves. The cadence discipline is what keeps the template alive past month 3; templates without explicit cadence calcify within a quarter.

    Expected outcome

    A defined monthly + quarterly refresh cadence that keeps the template alive and accurate.

Shuttergen

Template captures the strategy. Shuttergen ships the creative.

Once the fused template's action sheet lists creative tests driven by both positioning whitespace and PPC archetype gaps, Shuttergen generates the ad variants matched to both layers in a single sprint.

Pitfalls

What goes wrong

  • Building the strategic spine without the PPC data layer

    Classic competitor-analysis templates produce SWOT and positioning but no shippable PPC changes. The PPC data layer is what makes the template actionable in paid media.

  • Building the PPC data layer without the strategic spine

    PPC-only templates produce data dumps without interpretive frame. The strategic spine is what makes the PPC data meaningful - 'they outrank us on X' is information; 'they outrank us on X because their positioning is more specific to our shared target' is insight.

  • Skipping the visual positioning matrix because 'it's just for slides'

    The positioning matrix is where whitespace becomes visible. Tabular data hides patterns the visual surfaces. Keep the 2x2 even if no one outside the team will see it.

  • Letting the action sheet stay empty

    Beautiful classic-meets-PPC template structure with an empty action sheet produces nothing. The output section is the entire point; force yourself to populate it before considering the audit done.

Limits

When this playbook won't work

  • Your team doesn't use SWOT or classic competitor-analysis frameworks - the strategic spine adds overhead without familiarity
  • Your category has no positioning differentiation (commodity-grade) - the matrix collapses and the template's strategic value drops
  • PPC spend is too small for Auction Insights data - the PPC data layer becomes thin
  • You don't have ownership over both strategy and PPC execution - the template's value depends on someone bridging both layers

Why fuse competitor analysis with PPC templates

Classic competitor analysis templates produce strategic context but no operational moves. They tell you who competitors are, where they're positioned, what their SWOT looks like - and then sit in a drive while the paid-media team operates without that context.

PPC-only competitor templates produce operational moves but no strategic context. They tell you who bids on your keywords, what their ads look like, where impression share is shifting - and then drive bidding decisions divorced from the broader positioning question.

The fused template makes both layers reference each other. Competitor positioning informs which PPC moves make sense (defend keywords aligned with our positioning; cede keywords aligned with competitors' stronger positioning). PPC data validates positioning assumptions (if we claim to own 'enterprise B2B', our impression share on enterprise B2B keywords should reflect it).

Internal: ppc-competitor-analysis-template, ppc-competitor-analysis, ppc-marketing-competitor-analysis.

Template captures the strategy. Shuttergen ships the creative. Once the fused template's action sheet lists creative tests driven by both positioning whitespace and PPC archetype gaps, Shuttergen generates the ad variants matched to both layers in a single sprint.

Generate competitive creative free

How the fused template scales across team sizes

Solo founder or small team: one person fills the whole template. The fusion is automatic - the same brain holds positioning and bidding. Time investment: 60-90 minutes initially, 20 minutes monthly.

Mid-market team: marketing fills the strategic spine and SWOT; analytics fills the PPC data and Auction Insights; both meet to populate the action sheet. The template is the shared artifact that makes the cross-team meeting productive.

Enterprise team: the template becomes a category-leadership artifact, with brand, marketing ops, analytics, and creative each owning sections. The action sheet feeds quarterly planning. At this scale the template's value is coordination as much as analysis.

FAQ

Frequently asked

What's in a competitor analysis PPC template?
Six sections: strategic spine (positioning, target customer, value prop), PPC keyword + bidding data, PPC-specific SWOT, ad copy + landing page tags, positioning matrix (2x2), and action sheet output. Fuses classic competitor analysis with PPC-specific data.
How is this different from a regular PPC competitor analysis template?
Standard PPC templates skip the strategic spine and positioning matrix - they're purely PPC-data-focused. The fused template adds classic competitor-analysis structure on top, which produces strategic context and action.
How is this different from a classic competitor analysis template?
Classic templates skip the PPC data and action sheet - they're purely strategic. The fused template adds PPC-specific evidence to SWOT and a concrete action sheet output, which makes the analysis operational.
Should I build the template in Excel or another tool?
Excel or Google Sheets for the data sections; the 2x2 positioning matrix works as an embedded chart or a separate slide. Notion / Airtable work but lose the formulaic ease of spreadsheet-native action sheets.
How often do I refresh the template?
Monthly tactical refresh (PPC data, action sheet, ad-copy updates - 20 min). Quarterly strategic refresh (positioning, SWOT, matrix - 30 min). The split cadence matches how fast each layer actually changes.
How many competitors should the template cover?
5-10. Fewer than 5 misses the category context; more than 10 makes the strategic spine unmaintainable. The PPC data validates the right 5-10 - any competitor not in Auction Insights or shared keywords probably doesn't deserve a template row.
Can I share the template across teams?
Yes - it's designed for cross-team population. Marketing owns the strategic spine and SWOT; analytics owns the PPC data; both meet to fill the action sheet. The template is the artifact that makes the cross-team meeting productive.

Related

Keep reading

Template captures the strategy. Shuttergen ships the creative.

Once the fused template's action sheet lists creative tests driven by both positioning whitespace and PPC archetype gaps, Shuttergen generates the ad variants matched to both layers in a single sprint.